In anticipation, I started looking at the movie reviews a while back, not because I value their opinions, rather it's the 15 and 20 second clips the studio gives them, clips not usually incorporated into the official and unofficial trailers. Because of this habit of mine, I do tend to glance over the reviews. Usually the first sentence tells me if they loved the film or hated the film. With Godzilla the biggies didn't care for it, by biggies I mean the New York Times and the LA Times. NPR, on the other hand, liked it. So did Leonard Maltin. Check out Rotten Tomatoes if you want to get a more accurate idea of what people think.
One of the things I did find amusing in the reviews I'd checked out was that the Wall Street Journal gave it a bad review. This movie is going to make a lot of money, it made 9.3 million in the late night Thursday shows alone. Box Office Mojo thinks, world wide, it will end up in the 500 to 600 million dollar range till all is said and done. Wouldn't you think the Wall Street Journal would want to give it kick, a little boost, hoping it might earn another couple of million more? Maybe their reviewer doesn't like Warner Brothers and thought he might sour profits by a couple of million. Or, could be he's just enraptured with next week's release of X-Men: Days of Future Passed.
A word of warning to those who might decided to check out some of the "biggie' reviews (they're all available at Rotten Tomatoes). These reviewers like to reveal spoilers to prove their points... and they don't always warn you. Some pudding head by the name of A.O. Scott at the New York Times actually gives away a major plot element. When I'd read what he'd written I thought "what a dick head." Was the information he revealed essential in validating his review of the film? Absolutely not. Will it ruin the movie for me? Hell No! Yo! Godzilla! Can you hear me ROAR!?